In plain words

Raw materials an economy depends on but whose supply could be interrupted – because they come mostly from one country or a few mines, or only as a by-product of mining something else. The EU, the United States and other countries keep official lists. Several rely on such inputs: natural graphite for graphene, tungsten for WS2 and WSe2, borates for boron nitride, and gallium, indium or tellurium for others. Supply risk can matter as much as performance in deciding whether a material reaches the market.

Going deeper

Three panels. From mine to device: a chain of boxes from mine to refining to precursor to device. Concentrated supply: a bar showing that about three quarters of the natural graphite mined in 2023 came from China, and a note that gallium, tellurium and indium are by-products of bauxite, copper and zinc. Reducing the risk: substitute, recycle, diversify and use less. from mine to device mine graphite, tungsten refining often one country precursor powders, gases device flake, film, cell one narrow step anywhere in the chain is enough to put supply at risk concentrated supply natural graphite mined in 2023 China, about three quarters by-products: gallium from bauxite, tellurium from copper, indium from zinc few producers, few mines or dependence on another metal make a material critical reducing the risk substitute synthetic graphite, sodium-ion cells recycle scrap, used cells and targets diversify new mines and refineries use less a monolayer: milligrams per m² lists in the EU and the US are updated every few years; export controls change fast
Every material reaches a device through a chain from mine to refinery to precursor, and one narrow step is enough to put supply at risk. Natural graphite is mined mostly in China; gallium, tellurium and indium come only as by-products of other metals. Substitution, recycling, new sources and using less reduce the exposure.

What makes a material critical

A raw material is called critical when an economy depends on it and its supply is at risk. Assessments combine the two. Economic importance asks how much industry would lose without it and whether it can be substituted. Supply risk asks how concentrated production is, how stable the producing countries are, how much is imported and how much comes back through recycling. By-products add a twist: gallium is extracted from bauxite refining, tellurium from copper refining and indium from zinc, so their supply depends on demand for the main metal rather than on their own price. The EU revises its list every three years; the United States, Japan and others keep their own.

Where 2D materials are exposed

Natural graphite, the feedstock for graphene powders and for anodes, is mined mostly in China – about three quarters of world production in 2023 – and processed there even more, and China introduced export licensing for graphite at the end of 2023. Tungsten, needed for WS2 and WSe2, is on the EU list and mined mostly in China too, where exports of tungsten and molybdenum products have needed a licence since February 2025; borates, for hBN, come largely from Turkey and the United States; and powders, sapphire and silicon carbide come from a handful of suppliers. precursors add their own constraints, since selenium and tellurium are by-products and their hydrides are hazardous.

Reducing the risk

The usual remedies apply: substitute where possible – synthetic graphite from petroleum coke, sodium-ion cells that avoid some critical inputs – recycle scrap, used cells and sputtering targets, open new mines and refineries, and keep stockpiles. Thin films help by their nature: a of MoS2 weighs a few milligrams per square metre, so electronics use little material, while , coatings and battery electrodes use tonnes. The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act of 2024 sets targets for how much of its demand should be mined, processed and recycled within the EU and how little may come from any single other country.

For specialists

Materials assessed as both economically important and at high supply risk, using indicators of production concentration, the governance of producing countries, import reliance, substitutability and end-of-life recycling (as in the EU methodology and Graedel’s criticality framework). The EU list, revised every three years, includes graphite, tungsten, boron, gallium and germanium, and the Critical Raw Materials Act of 2024 sets targets for domestic extraction, processing and recycling; the United States keeps its own list, and China introduced export licensing for graphite at the end of 2023 and for tungsten, molybdenum, tellurium, bismuth and indium products in February 2025.

For 2D materials the exposure lies in feedstocks, precursors and – graphite, molybdenum and tungsten compounds, chalcogens, borates, MAX-phase powders, sapphire and SiC – and is reduced by substitution, synthetic routes, recycling and diversified supply; thin-film uses consume little material, bulk uses such as composites and battery anodes a great deal.

Where this comes from

  1. Methodology of metal criticality determination Graedel et al. · Environmental Science and Technology 46, 1063 (2012)
  2. Mineral commodity summaries 2024 U.S. Geological Survey · U.S. Geological Survey (2024)
  3. Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials European Union · Official Journal of the European Union, L series (2024)