In plain words

A crystal has a mirror symmetry if reflecting it in a plane leaves it unchanged. For a 2D sheet the question that matters most is whether it looks the same from above and from below – which decides how its electrons’ behave, which band crossings are protected, and even how a calculation of it has to be set up.

Going deeper

Left: a TMDC monolayer seen from the side, with chalcogen atoms above and below the metal plane and a dashed mirror plane through the middle; below it, a Janus layer with sulfur above and selenium below, which has no such mirror. Right: with the mirror, spins point straight out of the plane and there is no dipole across the layer; without it, spins tilt into the plane and a dipole appears. does it look the same from below? mirror plane MoS₂: sulfur above and below no mirror Janus: sulfur above, selenium below what hangs on it with the mirror spins point out of the plane, opposite in the two valleys no dipole across the layer, so a periodic calculation needs no dipole correction without it spins tilt into the plane; a dipole appears, and other mirrors protect crossings
For a single layer the mirror that matters most is the one in the plane of the sheet: does it look the same from above and below? If it does, spins split by spin–orbit coupling point straight out of the plane and no dipole can exist across the layer. Break it and both statements fail.

The horizontal mirror

A has a mirror plane through its metal layer: the planes above and below are identical, so reflecting the layer leaves it unchanged. That single symmetry has several consequences. It forbids any electric dipole across the layer, so the two faces are electrically equivalent. And when combined with the lack of an , it constrains to point spins perpendicular to the layer, out of plane, with opposite directions in the two – the locking behind and the valley-dependent spin splitting.

Remove the mirror – with a layer that has sulfur on one face and selenium on the other, with a , or with a gate field – and spins acquire in-plane components: physics appears, and so does a dipole.

A practical consequence for calculations

The mirror also matters to anyone running a periodic calculation. A slab without the horizontal mirror carries a dipole across it, and in a periodic supercell that dipole interacts with its own images through the vacuum, shifting the potential and the band energies and converging slowly with vacuum size.

The standard remedy is a dipole correction: an artificial sheet of charge placed in the vacuum that cancels the field. For symmetric slabs it is unnecessary, which is why the issue is easy to forget – and easy to get wrong when the model is changed to a Janus layer, a layer on a substrate or a gated slab. Published numbers for asymmetric slabs should say whether the correction was applied.

Vertical mirrors and protected crossings

Mirrors perpendicular to the layer matter too, because they can protect band degeneracies. States on a mirror plane can be labelled by their mirror eigenvalue, and two bands with different labels may cross without repelling. Whole lines of such crossings give – PbTaSe2 is a layered example – and a mirror-graded invariant, the mirror , classifies topological crystalline such as the SnTe family.

Because these protections rest on a crystalline symmetry rather than on time reversal, they are fragile in a specific way: , a substrate or a surface reconstruction that breaks the mirror gaps the crossings out. That sensitivity cuts both ways, since it also makes such states tunable by strain.

For specialists

Invariance under reflection through a plane. For a layer the horizontal mirror in the plane of the sheet matters most: it forbids an out-of-plane dipole, so a slab without it needs a dipole correction in a periodic calculation, and in a 2H monolayer that also lacks inversion it keeps spin–orbit-split spins pointing out of plane, the origin of Ising pairing. Vertical mirrors can protect band crossings – mirror-protected nodal lines in PbTaSe2, mirror Chern numbers in the SnTe class of topological crystalline insulators – and losing a mirror at a structural transition is how some chain compounds become .

Where this comes from

  1. Topological crystalline insulators in the SnTe material class Hsieh et al. · Nature Communications 3, 982 (2012) cited by 1,453
  2. Topological nodal-line fermions in spin-orbit metal PbTaSe2 Bian et al. · Nature Communications 7, 10556 (2016) cited by 860