In plain words
Electron states that leak from a metal contact into the it touches. They make the contact behave the same whichever metal is used, which is a big reason why contacts to 2D semiconductors are hard to improve.
Going deeper
States that only exist because the crystal ends
Solving a semiconductor’s for energies inside the gap gives no real wavevector, but it does give complex ones – solutions that oscillate and decay. In an infinite crystal those are discarded as unphysical. At a surface or an interface they are not, because a decaying solution is perfectly acceptable if it decays away from the boundary.
When a metal is placed against the semiconductor, its electrons tail into exactly those states. The result is a continuum of states at energies throughout the gap, localised within roughly a nanometre of the interface, whose character changes across the gap: -like near the top of the valence band, conduction-band-like near the bottom of the conduction band. The energy where the character crosses over is the charge neutrality level, or branch point.
What the picture predicts
Because those states can hold charge, they act as a reservoir. If the sits above the charge neutrality level they fill and acquire net negative charge; below it, they empty and charge positively. Either way the resulting dipole pushes the Fermi level back, so it ends up pinned near the neutrality level whatever metal was used, and the is set by the semiconductor’s band structure rather than by the metal’s work function.
Tersoff made this quantitative: taking the neutrality level from the bulk band structure alone gives canonical barrier heights that match measurements across many semiconductor–metal pairs. The degree of pinning is expressed as a slope – how much the barrier moves per electronvolt of work function – which depends on the density of gap states and on how well the interface screens.
Why a monolayer is a harder case
The decay length of these states is comparable to a ’s thickness, which means there is no part of a 2D channel that is far from the metal. In a bulk semiconductor the pinned region is a thin skin on a thick crystal; in a monolayer it is the whole channel. Measured slopes on monolayer MoS2 of around 0.11 – where 1 would mean no pinning at all – reflect that.
There is a second, non-intrinsic contributor that is easy to confuse with this one. Evaporating a metal onto a monolayer damages it, and the resulting and reacted regions add their own gap states. The cleanest discriminator is to remove the intrinsic mechanism: inserting a of a few ångström, either by transferring a peeled metal film or by a thin buffer, cuts the evanescent tails enough that barrier heights begin to follow work functions again. That contacts made this way behave so differently is the strongest evidence that the leakage, not only the damage, is real.
For specialists
Evanescent metal wavefunctions penetrating a semiconductor’s gap at a contact; a major cause of Fermi-level pinning.
Where this comes from
- Theory of surface states cited by 1,336
- Schottky barrier heights and the continuum of gap states cited by 1,389