In plain words

A magnet whose atomic magnets never settle into a pattern, even at absolute zero. Quantum effects keep them fluctuating and entangled – linked so that none has a direction of its own – so instead of freezing into order the material stays restless, like a liquid that never turns solid. Disturbances in it can behave like fractions of an electron, carrying its magnetism but not its charge.

Going deeper

Left: three spins on a triangle – two can point opposite ways but the third cannot oppose both, so the arrangement is frustrated. Right: scattered intensity against energy, with a sharp peak for an ordered magnet and a broad continuum for a spin liquid. spins that cannot all be satisfied ? two neighbours can oppose each other, the third cannot oppose both on a triangle, or through bond-dependent exchange on a honeycomb, the spins keep fluctuating instead of settling the excitations look different scattered intensity energy ordered: a sharp peak liquid: a broad continuum α-RuCl₃ shows the continuum – but also orders magnetically at low temperature
In a quantum spin liquid the spins never settle into a pattern, even at absolute zero: frustration and quantum fluctuations keep them entangled and moving. The clearest experimental sign is what the excitations look like – a broad continuum rather than the sharp magnon of an ordered magnet.

Order that never arrives

Most magnets order on cooling. A spin liquid does not, despite strong interactions between the . The usual ingredient is : on a triangle, two neighbouring spins can point opposite ways but the third cannot oppose both, so no arrangement satisfies every bond. With quantum fluctuations added, the ground state becomes a superposition of many configurations rather than any one of them.

Anderson proposed such a state in 1973 as a resonating arrangement of singlet pairs. What distinguishes it from a simple magnet is long-range entanglement: the state cannot be described by any local , and it supports excitations that behave as fractions of a spin flip – spinons, or in the Kitaev case and fluxes.

The honeycomb route

Kitaev’s exactly solvable model puts spins on a with a different coupling on each of the three bond directions. No single spin direction can satisfy all three, and the model’s ground state is a spin liquid whose excitations are Majorana fermions. Materials with heavy elements and the right orbital arrangement – iridates first, then α-RuCl3 – were proposed as approximate realisations.

α-RuCl3 is layered, which makes it a problem: it can be exfoliated, strained and stacked. found the strong and the excitation continuum expected near a Kitaev spin liquid – and also at low temperature, the complication that makes it proximate rather than a realisation.

What would count as evidence

Proving a negative – no order – is not enough, since disorder can also prevent ordering. The positive signatures are indirect. A continuum in inelastic neutron scattering suggests fractionalised excitations, but , disorder and short-range order produce continua too. A thermal Hall conductance quantised in half-integer units would point to a Majorana ; reports of it in α-RuCl3 in a magnetic field have been contested and are sensitive to sample quality and to phonon contributions.

So the field proceeds by accumulation: scattering, thermodynamic, thermal-transport and local-probe measurements on the same well-characterised crystals, with and residual order controlled. For layered candidates, adds and twist as new knobs – and new ways to spoil the sample.

For specialists

A ground state of a frustrated magnet with no down to zero temperature, marked by long-range entanglement, an emergent gauge structure and fractionalised excitations such as spinons or Majorana fermions. Honeycomb materials with bond-dependent – α-RuCl3 above all – are the leading layered candidates, but the evidence is indirect: a scattering continuum and thermal , against residual magnetic order in zero field.

Where this comes from

  1. Resonating valence bonds: a new kind of insulator? Anderson · Materials Research Bulletin 8, 153 (1973) cited by 2,818
  2. Proximate Kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeycomb magnet Banerjee et al. · Nature Materials 15, 733 (2016) cited by 839