Exchange interaction

Theory track

In plain words

The force that lines up the tiny magnets of neighbouring atoms in a magnetic material – all the same way in a , alternating in an antiferromagnet. Despite what it does, it is not magnetic in origin: it comes from the electric repulsion between electrons combined with a quantum rule that keeps two electrons from sharing the same state, which makes their energy depend on whether their point the same way. It is far stronger than the magnetic pull between atomic magnets, which is why iron stays magnetic up to 770 °C.

Going deeper

Three panels. Parallel or opposite: a row of spins all pointing up, labelled a ferromagnet, and a row alternating up and down, labelled an antiferromagnet. Through the atom between: two metal atoms joined through a ligand in a straight line, usually coupled opposite, and joined through a ligand at a right angle, often coupled parallel. Layered magnets: two layers whose spins are parallel within each layer, strongly coupled, while the two layers point opposite ways, weakly coupled. parallel or opposite one sign: all parallel a ferromagnet the other: alternating electric repulsion plus the quantum rule for electrons not a magnetic force at all through the atom between 180°: usually opposite 90°: often parallel metal ligand superexchange: the bond angle sets the sign, as in CrI₃ the Goodenough–Kanamori rules layered magnets: two scales weak between layers strong within each layer the weak coupling between layers is easy to switch CrI₃: stacking decides it
Exchange makes neighbouring spins line up parallel, as in a ferromagnet, or alternate, as in an antiferromagnet. In insulators it acts through the atom between two magnetic ones, and the bond angle sets its sign. In layered magnets it is strong within each layer and weak between layers, so the stacking of the layers can switch how they couple.

Not a magnetic force

Two neighbouring atomic magnets pull on each other magnetically, but far too weakly to explain magnetism at room temperature: that interaction is worth about a kelvin or less. The real cause, found by and Dirac in 1926, is electric. Electrons repel each other, and quantum mechanics forbids two of them with the same spin from occupying the same place. Electrons with parallel spins therefore keep further apart and repel each other less – or, depending on the orbitals involved, opposite spins win because they let the electrons spread over both atoms. The resulting energy difference between parallel and antiparallel spins is the exchange interaction, worth tens to hundreds of kelvin.

Its sign decides the kind of magnet: one sign lines the spins up into a ferromagnet, the other alternates them into an antiferromagnet, and competing couplings to more distant neighbours produce spirals and frustrated states.

Through the atom between

In magnetic the magnetic atoms rarely touch; their electrons interact through the atoms in between. In this superexchange the sign depends on the geometry: when the bond from one metal through a ligand to the next is straight, the coupling is usually antiferromagnetic; when it bends at about 90°, as between the octahedra of CrI3 and Cr2Ge2Te6, it is often ferromagnetic. These Goodenough–Kanamori rules explain why so many layered and chalcogenides are ferromagnetic within their layers.

In metals the conduction electrons carry the coupling instead, by the RKKY or double-exchange mechanisms, and in heavy elements strong makes it depend on the direction of the spins relative to the bond. That bond-dependent form, proposed by Kitaev, is what makes α-RuCl3 a candidate .

Exchange in layered magnets

A magnet has two very different couplings. Within a layer, exchange is strong and sets the temperature scale of the order. Between layers it is far weaker and can have either sign – which is why CrI3 is ferromagnetic within each layer but its layers alternate in thin , and why a change in stacking under pressure can switch them to parallel. Because the coupling between layers is so weak, a gate, or a neighbouring layer can change it too, which makes these magnets attractive for devices.

Exchange alone cannot order a , though: by the an isotropic magnet in two dimensions has no long-range order at any finite temperature, and it is magnetic anisotropy that lets CrI3 order as a monolayer. Computed exchange constants also need care, because values depend on the choice of U; spectra from neutron or scattering are the check.

For specialists

The spin-dependent energy that arises from the Coulomb repulsion together with the antisymmetry of the many-electron wavefunction, modelled as a coupling J between neighbouring spins in Heisenberg, Ising or XY form. In insulators it is mostly mediated by ligands – superexchange, whose sign follows the Goodenough–Kanamori rules: antiferromagnetic for metal–ligand–metal angles near 180°, often ferromagnetic near 90°, as in the edge-sharing octahedra of CrI3 – in metals by conduction electrons (RKKY, double exchange), and with strong spin–orbit coupling it becomes or bond-dependent (Kitaev). In van der Waals magnets the intralayer exchange of a few meV sets the ordering scale, while a much weaker interlayer exchange decides ferro- or antiferromagnetic stacking and depends on the stacking itself; ordering a monolayer additionally requires anisotropy, by the Mermin–Wagner theorem.

Where this comes from

  1. Mehrkörperproblem und Resonanz in der Quantenmechanik Heisenberg · Zeitschrift für Physik 38, 411 (1926)
  2. Antiferromagnetism. Theory of superexchange interaction Anderson · Physical Review 79, 350 (1950)
  3. Superexchange interaction and symmetry properties of electron orbitals Kanamori · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 10, 87 (1959)
  4. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit Huang et al. · Nature 546, 270 (2017) cited by 5,987
  5. Switching 2D magnetic states via pressure tuning of layer stacking Song et al. · Nature Materials 18, 1298 (2019)