In plain words

The ratio in which the elements of a compound are combined – the numbers in its formula. MoS2 should have two sulfur atoms for every molybdenum atom. Real crystals often deviate slightly, with a few atoms missing or a few extra squeezed in, and in a deviation of a few percent can change how a crystal conducts, glows or behaves magnetically. That is why careful work measures the composition rather than assuming the formula.

Going deeper

Three panels. The recipe: a side view of MoS₂ with one row of molybdenum atoms between two rows of sulfur atoms, two sulfur atoms for every molybdenum. Real crystals deviate: the same layer with a few sulfur atoms missing. Growth conditions decide: an axis from metal-rich to sulfur-rich growth conditions, with sulfur vacancies common at the metal-rich end and fewer at the sulfur-rich end. the recipe: MoS₂ two sulfur atoms for every molybdenum the formula gives the ratio of the elements in an ideal, perfect crystal real crystals deviate missing sulfur: under 2 S per Mo a few percent changes everything vacancies, extra metal between layers or swapped atoms dope the crystal growth conditions decide metal-rich sulfur-rich more sulfur vacancies fewer vacancies the atmosphere during growth the chemical conditions and the Fermi level set which defects form, and how many
The formula gives the ratio of the elements in a perfect crystal – two sulfur atoms for every molybdenum in MoS2. Real crystals lose or gain a few atoms, and the conditions during growth decide how many: a metal-rich atmosphere leaves more sulfur vacancies than a sulfur-rich one.

Recipe and reality

A chemical formula is a recipe: MoS2 has two sulfur atoms for every molybdenum atom, CrI3 three iodine atoms for every chromium. In a perfect crystal the ratio holds exactly. Real crystals are rarely perfect. Some sites stay empty, extra atoms slip between the layers, and atoms of one element take the place of another, so the measured composition differs slightly from the formula – the crystal is non-stoichiometric.

The deviation is set by the conditions of growth. Each kind of defect costs a formation energy that depends on how much of each element is available: growing in a sulfur-poor, metal-rich atmosphere makes cheap, a sulfur-rich one suppresses them. It also depends on the , because many defects carry charge. That is why the same compound made by different methods, or in different laboratories, can behave differently.

Why a few percent matters

In a , one missing atom in ten thousand is already a large level. Chalcogen vacancies make many n-type; extra titanium atoms sitting between the layers of TiS2 give it so many electrons that it behaves like a metal, which long clouded whether TiS2 is a semiconductor at all. In magnets and , the content of the alkali or rare-earth element shifts the – in AV3Sb5 and EuSn2As2 variations between samples are a main source of disagreement. Layered materials add a twist: atoms can sit in the without disturbing the layers much, so large deviations can hide in a crystal that looks perfect.

Measuring it

gives the composition near the surface, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy in an electron microscope gives it at a chosen spot, and Rutherford backscattering or electron-probe microanalysis give more accurate averages. None is better than about a percent without careful standards, which is not enough to see the deviations that matter most for doping. In practice small deviations are often inferred from properties – carrier density, , transition temperature – and the growth conditions are reported so that others can reproduce them.

For specialists

The proportions of the elements in a compound, ideally the integer ratios of its formula. Real crystals are often non-stoichiometric, through , interstitials, antisites or atoms whose concentrations depend on the chemical potentials during growth and on the Fermi level, as point-defect thermodynamics describes. Deviations dope the material and can decide its ground state: -deficient TMDCs are n-type, self-intercalated titanium makes TiS2 rather than semiconducting, the alkali content of AV3Sb5 and the europium content of EuSn2As2 shift their transitions, and melt-grown InSe varies along the boule. Composition is measured by X-ray photoelectron or energy-dispersive spectroscopy, Rutherford backscattering or electron-probe microanalysis, with accuracies of about a percent at best, so small deviations are often inferred from properties instead.

Where this comes from

  1. Relations between the concentrations of imperfections in crystalline solids Kröger and Vink · Solid State Physics 3, 307 (1956)
  2. Chemical potential dependence of defect formation energies in GaAs: application to Ga self-diffusion Zhang and Northrup · Physical Review Letters 67, 2339 (1991)
  3. Impurities and electronic property variations of natural MoS2 crystal surfaces Addou et al. · ACS Nano 9, 9124 (2015)