The name for single-element modelled on graphene: silicene from silicon, germanene from germanium, phosphorene from phosphorus and so on. Most of them are far less stable in air than graphene.
Going deeper
The Xenes are single-element sheets named after graphene. Most are not flat: heavier elements prefer bonding that pulls alternate atoms out of the plane, which changes their electronic structure and, in most cases, leaves them far more reactive than graphene.
Why most of them buckle
Carbon is happy with flat sp2 bonding, which is why graphene is a plane. Silicon, germanium and tin favour sp3-like bonding with angles, so their sheets corrugate: alternate atoms sit above and below the mean plane, by about 0.4 Å in silicene. Phosphorene goes further, with a puckered structure that also makes its two in-plane directions inequivalent.
Buckling is not merely cosmetic. It mixes orbitals that stay separate in a flat sheet, brings in the much stronger of heavier elements, and makes the sheet respond to an electric field applied across it – the basis for predictions that stanene and germanene could be with usable gaps.
Made on a surface, not peeled off one
Graphene comes from graphite, and phosphorene from black phosphorus, because those bulk parents are layered. Silicon and germanium have no layered allotrope, so silicene and germanene must be grown, usually by depositing atoms onto a metal surface in ultrahigh vacuum. The 2012 report of silicene on Ag(111) combined tunnelling microscopy, and calculations to argue that a buckled honeycomb of silicon had formed.
Growing on a metal has a cost: the hybridises with the sheet, so the free-standing is altered, and claims of in supported silicene have been contested on exactly those grounds. Moving such a sheet onto an without destroying it remains the hard part; directly after growth is one route that has been tried.
Stability, and what they are good for
Air is the main enemy. Phosphorene degrades within hours to days unless capped, silicene and germanene oxidise almost immediately off their growth substrate, and only a few – antimonene and bismuthene among them – are comparatively robust. This is why almost all device results for these materials involve immediate encapsulation, and why reported properties should be read together with how long the sample had been exposed.
What they offer in exchange is variety that graphene lacks: a real in phosphorene and antimonene, strong spin–orbit coupling in the heavier members, in-plane in phosphorene and tellurene, and predicted . Tellurene is the odd member, built from helical chains rather than a honeycomb.
For specialists
Monoelemental 2D crystals named by analogy with graphene – borophene, silicene, germanene, stanene, phosphorene, antimonene, bismuthene and tellurene. Unlike graphene most are buckled or puckered, many exist only on supporting substrates, and is a major constraint.