Charge transfer

Everyday term

In plain words

Electrons moving from one material to its neighbour simply because they are more comfortable there. It is how a layer gets doped without adding a single impurity atom to it – the charge comes from the molecule, or layer next door.

Going deeper

Left: two layers apart, their levels referenced to a common vacuum level and their Fermi levels at different depths; in contact, the Fermi levels line up, electrons cross from one to the other and a dipole is left at the interface. Right: a staggered junction after a photon – light creates a pair, the electron crosses to the other layer in under 50 femtoseconds and the hole stays behind. levels line up, charge moves apart layer A layer B vacuum level in contact one Fermi level electrons cross one side ends up doped, the other depleted, and a dipole is left at the interface after a photon: separated in femtoseconds light electron hole stays in a MoS₂/WS₂ stack the electron crosses in under 50 femtoseconds, before it can recombine
Charge transfer is what happens when two materials with different electron energies touch: electrons move until the levels agree, doping one side and depleting the other. After optical excitation in a stacked pair, the same process separates electron and hole within tens of femtoseconds.

Levels equalise, charge moves

Separately, two materials have their own – the energy needed to remove an electron to vacuum. Bring them into contact and electrons flow from the material with the shallower states into the one with the deeper states until the electrochemical potential is the same throughout. What is left behind is a sheet of positive charge on one side, negative on the other: an interface dipole, and near the junction.

For a 2D layer this is a way of without ever introducing an impurity atom into the lattice. Adsorbed molecules, a substrate, a metal contact or a partner layer can all shift the carrier density substantially, which is why the same measures differently on different supports.

Surface transfer doping

Deliberate versions of this are standard practice. Strong electron acceptors deposited on a surface pull electrons out and leave the layer ; alkali metals donate and make it n-type; acidic treatments dope graphene heavily. The effect is reversible, needs no lattice damage, and can be applied after a device is built – which is why it is used to dope contact regions.

The drawback is that the dopants sit on the surface, where they can desorb, migrate or react with air, so the doping drifts with time and atmosphere. freezes the state, for better or worse. Because the charged species remain nearby, they also scatter carriers, so usually falls as doping rises.

Transfer after light: type-II stacks

Stack two different monolayers so that their are staggered, and photoexcited carriers have somewhere better to go. In MoS2/WS2 the electron crosses into one layer and the hole into the other in under 50 – faster than they can recombine – leaving an whose electron and hole sit in different layers.

That separation is what makes such stacks useful for and light harvesting, and what makes interlayer excitons long-lived enough to study. The same speed is a nuisance for anything that needs the pair to stay together, such as bright emission, which is why light-emitting stacks are designed with type-I alignments instead. Which case applies depends on the band alignment, and that alignment can be shifted by , or the .

For specialists

Equilibration of electrochemical potential across an interface, moving electrons to whichever side has the deeper states and leaving a dipole and band bending behind. It dopes 2D layers without substitutional , from adsorbed molecules and substrate to the partner layer in a type-II stack, where photoexcited carriers separate in tens of femtoseconds – faster than they recombine, which is what makes such stacks useful for light harvesting and detection.

Where this comes from

  1. Surface transfer doping of semiconductors Ristein · Science 313, 1057 (2006) cited by 160
  2. Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS2/WS2 heterostructures Hong et al. · Nature Nanotechnology 9, 682 (2014) cited by 2,318