Band alignment

Everyday term

In plain words

How the energy levels of two materials line up when they are put together: whether one material’s electrons sit above or below the other’s. Electrons roll ‘downhill’ to the lower level, so the alignment decides which way charge moves across the junction, and so decides what the stack can be used for.

Going deeper

Left: three pairs of band diagrams for two layers A and B. In type I the bands of B lie inside those of A; in type II they are staggered, both edges of B lying below those of A; in type III they are broken, the conduction band of B lying below the valence band of A. Right: what each is used for – light emission, carrier separation, and tunnel junctions. three ways two layers can line up A B type I A B type II A B type III energy upwards; bars are the band edges what each one is good for type I – straddling both carriers end up in the same layer, so the stack emits light type II – staggered electron and hole separate into different layers: detectors and solar cells type III – broken the bands overlap, so carriers tunnel straight across: tunnel junctions no alignment is fixed: interface dipoles, the surroundings and a gate all shift it
When two layers meet, what matters is how their band edges line up. Straddling alignments keep both carriers together and emit light, staggered ones pull electron and hole apart, and broken ones let carriers tunnel straight across.

Three cases

Referenced to a common vacuum level, each material has an ionisation potential and an electron affinity, and putting two together gives one of three arrangements. In type I, straddling, one material’s gap lies entirely within the other’s, so both collect in the narrower-gap layer – the arrangement used for light emission. In type II, staggered, the of one layer and the valence band of the other are the lower ones, so an electron and a hole end up in different layers. In type III, broken, the bands do not overlap in energy at all, and carriers pass straight from the valence band of one into the conduction band of the other.

For type II is the most consequential: it produces , and it is what makes stacked and junctions work.

Why stacking makes it easier to predict – and still not easy

In conventional , alignment is complicated by at the interface, from lattice mismatch, and interdiffusion. stacking avoids all three, so as a first approximation the alignment simply follows the ionisation potentials and electron affinities of the isolated layers – the Anderson rule that fails badly for covalent interfaces works far better here.

But only as a first approximation. across the interface builds a dipole that shifts the bands; the surroundings change the gaps themselves; changes how the bands of the two layers meet in momentum as well as energy; and a gate can shift one layer relative to the other, which is how a junction is made tunable in situ.

Measuring it

The cleanest measurements combine techniques. gives the valence-band offset directly, and micro-ARPES can do it on a single stack; gives both edges at a chosen spot; optical measurements give transition energies but need the subtracted before they can be compared with band edges.

The caution is that an offset measured on one sample need not transfer. Values depend on the , on , on the twist angle and on whether the interface is clean, and calculated alignments depend on the functional and on whether the environment was included. Reported numbers for the same pair of can differ by a few tenths of an electronvolt, which is enough to change the predicted type.

For specialists

The relative positions of the band edges of two materials in contact, classified as straddling (type I), staggered (type II) or broken (type III). Van der Waals stacking avoids chemical bonding and strain, so alignments start close to the isolated layers’ ionisation potentials and electron affinities, shifted by interface dipoles and by the . A type-II alignment puts electron and hole in different layers, which is what makes interlayer excitons and photovoltaic junctions possible.

Where this comes from

  1. Determination of band alignment in the single-layer MoS2/WSe2 heterojunction Chiu et al. · Nature Communications 6, 7666 (2015) cited by 675
  2. Band alignment of two-dimensional semiconductors for designing heterostructures with momentum space matching Özçelik et al. · Physical Review B 94, 035125 (2016) cited by 476