In plain words
Building a second layer of electronic devices directly on top of a finished chip, instead of making two chips separately and joining them.
Going deeper
Stacking, two ways
The established way to get more devices into a given footprint is to make chips separately and bond them, connecting them with through-silicon vias. It works and is in production, but the vias are large – micrometres across – so the number of connections between layers is limited, and each die is thinned and aligned mechanically.
Monolithic integration instead builds the upper layers in place, on top of the completed lower ones. Alignment is lithographic rather than mechanical, and the vias between layers can be as small as ordinary . That allows orders of magnitude more connections between layers, which is what makes tightly coupled logic-on-memory arrangements conceivable.
Why 2D materials keep appearing in these proposals
Two properties fit. A channel under a nanometre thick adds almost nothing to the height of the stack, so many layers can be built without the structure becoming impractically tall. And 2D layers can be grown elsewhere and at low temperature, or grown at temperatures far below those needed for crystalline silicon on an amorphous surface – which is exactly the constraint that makes monolithic stacking difficult with conventional materials.
A demonstration that combined carbon-nanotube , resistive memory and silicon logic in one stacked chip made the case concretely: the upper layers were built at temperatures the lower ones could survive.
What has to work before it is real
The requirements are unforgiving. Every upper layer must be processed within the of everything beneath. Transfer or growth must be uniform across a 300 mm , not on one . Yield multiplies: two layers at 90% give 81%, and stacks are only worth building if each layer is nearly perfect. Heat has to escape through a structure that is now thicker and largely , and design tools have to handle the extra dimension.
The realistic near-term target is not logic on logic but memory or specialised layers on logic, where the upper layer can be slower and a modest density gain is still valuable – and where a failed upper layer does not ruin the chip beneath it.
For specialists
Building additional active device layers directly on top of a finished circuit rather than bonding separate chips.