In plain words

A score from 1 to 9 for how close a technology is to real use: 1 means the basic idea has been observed, 9 means it is proven in products working in the field.

Going deeper

A staircase of nine steps. Levels 1 to 3, research: principle observed, concept stated, proof of concept. Levels 4 to 6, development: works in the lab, validated in a relevant setting, shown in a relevant setting. Levels 7 to 9, deployment: prototype in use, system qualified, proven in operation. A note says a single device in a paper is usually level 3 or 4, and the climb from 4 to 7 is where most projects stall. nine levels, from an observed principle to a proven product 1 principle observed 2 concept stated 3 proof of concept 4 works in the lab 5 validated in setting 6 shown in setting 7 prototype in use 8 system qualified 9 proven in operation research development deployment a single device in a paper is usually level 3 or 4; the climb from 4 to 7 is where most projects stall
The nine technology readiness levels, grouped into research, development and deployment. Most published 2D-material devices sit on the lower steps; the middle of the staircase, where a lab result has to become reliable, reproducible and manufacturable, is where most technologies stop.

Where the scale comes from

NASA introduced technology readiness levels in the 1970s to judge whether a technology was mature enough to fly, and the scale settled on nine levels. It spread to defence agencies, to the European Space Agency and to the European Union’s research programmes, and was standardised for space systems as ISO 16290.

The levels run from basic principles observed (1), a technology concept formulated (2) and an experimental proof of concept (3), through validation in the laboratory (4), validation in a relevant environment (5) and demonstration in a relevant environment (6), to a prototype demonstrated in an operational environment (7), a complete and qualified system (8) and an actual system proven in operation (9).

Applying it to 2D materials

A readiness level belongs to a technology in a particular application, not to a material. Graphene as such has no TRL. Graphene as a filler in , conductive or is already in commercial products, while graphene logic remain research. Two-dimensional transistors are being developed on industrial pilot lines, roughly in the middle of the scale, whereas a typical paper reporting one excellent device is level 3 or 4.

The hardest climb is from about 4 to 7. Here a result has to work across a whole rather than on one , with reproducible contacts and , acceptable yield and variability, lasting reliability, and a process compatible with existing fabs. This stretch is often called the of death.

Reading readiness claims

Levels are usually self-assessed, and the words “relevant environment” carry much of the weight. A useful check is to ask which application is meant, in which environment it was tested, on how many devices, and for how long.

A system is only as ready as its least mature part: a transistor channel at level 5 does not help if the contacts, the or the are still at level 3. TRL also says nothing about cost, supply or market. Production maturity has its own manufacturing readiness levels, and a technology can be ready in principle yet uneconomic in practice.

For specialists

A 1–9 scale describing maturity from basic principles (1) to proven operational use (9).

Where this comes from

  1. ISO 16290:2013 — Space systems: definition of the technology readiness levels (TRL) and their criteria of assessment ISO · International Organization for Standardization (2013)
  2. Technology readiness assessments: a retrospective Mankins · Acta Astronautica 65, 1216 (2009) cited by 723