Newer designs in which the controlling gate wraps completely around thin stacked channels – like gripping a hose with the whole hand rather than pinching it from one side. In the CFET version the two kinds of transistor a circuit needs are also stacked on top of each other to save space.
Going deeper
Each generation wraps the gate further around the channel, because a gate that surrounds the channel controls it better and lets the channel be shorter. The CFET takes the next step in the other direction: stacking the two device types on top of each other.
Why the gate keeps wrapping further round
A transistor turns off when the gate, not the drain, controls the channel potential. As channels shorten, the drain starts to compete, the device leaks, and the subthreshold slope degrades – effects. The fix has always been geometric: increase the fraction of the channel the gate surrounds, and shrink the channel’s thickness so no part of it is far from the gate.
Planar gave way to the FinFET, with the gate on three sides of a thin vertical fin. The , or gate-all-around, device closes the fourth side: the channel is a stack of horizontal sheets, each fully enclosed by the gate. That gives the best electrostatic control available for a given channel thickness, and the sheet width becomes a design knob, since drive current scales with it.
Stacking the complementary pair
The CFET attacks the other axis. A logic cell always needs both an and a device, and in every layout so far they sit side by side, which sets the cell’s width. Stacking one directly above the other – an n-type sheet over a p-type fin or sheet – removes that side-by-side requirement, and design-technology co-optimisation studies put the resulting area saving at about half for both standard cells and SRAM bit cells.
The cost is vertical complexity. Contacts and power now have to be reached through deep vias whose parasitic resistance dominates the device, so the gain depends on advances in contact metallisation with thin barriers. The process also has to control the elevation dimension – how high each layer sits – as carefully as it controls lithographic width, which is a different kind of manufacturing problem from the one the industry has spent decades solving.
Where a 2D channel would fit
This is the roadmap into which 2D are usually proposed. The sheets in a gate-all-around stack keep getting thinner, and thin silicon has a problem: below a few nanometres, falls sharply because carriers scatter from the sheet’s own surfaces and from thickness fluctuations. A semiconductor is thin by construction, with an atomically defined thickness and no on its surfaces, so in principle it does not pay that penalty.
What stands between the proposal and a device is everything the rest of this glossary is about: , the lack of a scalable on a surface with nothing to bond to, growth or transfer with acceptable uniformity, and variability measured over thousands of devices rather than a few. The architecture is not the obstacle – the integration is.
For specialists
Transistor architectures in which the gate surrounds stacked channel sheets; complementary FETs stack n- and p-type devices vertically.