In plain words
How much more current a lets through when it is switched on than when it is switched off. A switch for digital logic needs at least ten thousand, and far more in chips that spend most of their time idle; graphene, which has no , manages only about ten, which is why it cannot replace silicon in logic.
Going deeper
Why a switch needs a large ratio
A logic chip holds billions of transistors, and at any moment nearly all of them are off. Their combined leakage sets the power drawn while nothing is happening, while the on current sets how fast each transistor can charge the next one. A chip therefore needs both a large on current and a tiny off current, and the ratio between them is the first test of any new channel material: at least 104 for logic, and 106 or more for low-power chips that spend most of their time idle.
Other uses ask for less. A radio-frequency amplifier works around a single operating point and never has to switch fully off, so a small ratio does it no harm – which is why graphene transistors were first taken seriously for high-frequency analogue circuits rather than logic.
What sets it
Below threshold the current is carried by the few electrons with enough thermal energy to cross the barrier the gate controls, and at room temperature that population changes at most tenfold for every 60 mV the barrier moves. The ratio therefore grows with the voltage window available and with how close the comes to that limit. It is also capped by the band gap: push the barrier further and carriers of the other sign start to flow through the channel, so a small gap limits the ratio however good the gate. Graphene, with no gap at all, manages about 2 to 20 at room temperature.
MoS2, with a gap of nearly 2 eV, reached a ratio of about 108 in the first single-layer transistors in 2011. bring leakage of their own – the drain lowers the barrier, and carriers tunnel from source to drain beneath it – and here a channel less than a nanometre thick helps, because the gate keeps control of all of it.
Reading a reported ratio
A ratio on its own can mislead in four ways. The voltage window: a ratio taken across a 60 V sweep of a on thick oxide says little about a transistor that has to switch within a volt. The off current: many very large ratios are really the noise floor of the instrument, a picoampere or so, so the off current should be given in amperes per micrometre of width, next to that floor. The conditions: drain voltage, temperature, and whether the value comes from one champion device or a distribution. And the on current: a huge ratio with a tiny on current still makes a poor switch.
For these reasons transistor benchmarks fix the off current and the supply voltage – for example 100 nA/µm at about 0.7 V – and compare the on current reached there, which folds the ratio, the swing and the into one number that can be set beside silicon’s.
For specialists
The ratio of the drain current with the transistor switched on to the current with it switched off, at a stated supply voltage. Below threshold the current falls at best tenfold per 60 mV of gate voltage at room temperature, so a ratio of 106 needs at least 0.36 V of swing, and the off current is floored by leakage over the gap, band-to-band and source-to-drain tunnelling, and gate leakage. Monolayer MoS2 transistors reached about 108; gapless graphene stays near 10 at room temperature. Benchmarks compare the on current at a fixed off current and supply voltage rather than the ratio alone.
Where this comes from
- Single-layer MoS2 transistors cited by 14,996
- Graphene transistors cited by 5,270