In plain words

Light given off by a material after it has absorbed light – what a highlighter pen does under a black light. In 2D the colour and brightness of that glow report how many layers there are, how clean the sample is and whether it is carrying extra charge.

Going deeper

Left: an energy diagram with a valence band, a conduction band and an exciton level below the conduction band. An arrow up marks absorption, a wavy arrow marks relaxation to the exciton level, a downward arrow marks light emission, and a dashed path through a defect level marks non-radiative loss. Right: emission spectra against photon energy – a tall narrow monolayer peak near 1.9 eV, a smaller trion shoulder at lower energy, and a weak broad bilayer peak lower still. absorb, relax, emit conduction band valence band exciton absorb relax emit light defect: no light one layer glows, two barely do emitted light photon energy monolayer ≈ 1.9 eV trion bilayer
Photoluminescence follows absorption, relaxation and recombination. In a monolayer TMDC the light comes from excitons and trions rather than free carriers, and the monolayer glows far more brightly than the bilayer because its gap is direct.

What happens between absorption and emission

A with more than the gap energy lifts an electron into the , leaving a hole behind. Within picoseconds the pair loses its excess energy to and settles at the band edge, where the two bind into an . When the pair recombines radiatively, a photon leaves with the exciton energy, which is why emission always appears at lower energy than the light that caused it.

The competition is with non-radiative paths. Defects trap carriers and release the energy as heat, and at high excitation density excitons annihilate each other. The quantum yield – photons out per photon absorbed – measures who wins. As-exfoliated MoS2 emits weakly, but treating it chemically to passivate defects brought its yield close to unity.

What a spectrum reveals

The peak energy gives the , so it tracks layer number, and the surroundings. Monolayer MoS2, with its direct gap, glows brightly near 1.9 eV; the bilayer, whose gap is indirect, emits far more weakly and at lower energy. This contrast is a quick layer counter.

Extra peaks carry more information. A shoulder a few tens of millielectronvolts below the exciton is the , an exciton with one extra carrier, and its weight grows with – so the spectrum also reads or unintentional . Linewidth reports and temperature, and in clean samples it narrows towards the intrinsic limit. Defect-bound emission appears at still lower energy and dominates at low temperature.

Measuring it carefully

Photoluminescence is easy to record and easy to over-interpret. The laser both excites and heats: too much power shifts and broadens peaks, ionises excitons into a plasma and can damage materials, so power dependence should be checked rather than assumed. Spectra also depend on the through interference, which changes how much light is absorbed and collected – the same on oxide of different thickness gives different intensities.

Comparisons need the excitation wavelength and power, the temperature, the substrate and the collection geometry. Intensity alone rarely supports a claim about quality; linewidth, yield measured against a standard, and the exciton-to-trion ratio are the sturdier numbers.

For specialists

Radiative recombination following optical excitation. In monolayer the spectrum is dominated by excitons and trions rather than free carriers, so peak energy, linewidth and quantum yield track layer number, strain, , doping and defect density. The indirect-to-direct crossover makes the monolayer far brighter than the bilayer, and chemical treatment of defects can bring the yield close to unity.

Where this comes from

  1. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2 Splendiani et al. · Nano Letters 10, 1271 (2010) cited by 9,520
  2. Near-unity photoluminescence quantum yield in MoS2 Amani et al. · Science 350, 1065 (2015) cited by 1,242